Reebok fined for misleading customers about EasyTone sneakers

By Esther Han
Updated October 23 2014 - 7:18pm, first published 3:28pm
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.
Ads stating that Reebok's EasyTone shoes were better for calves, thighs and buttocks were misleading, the Federal Court found.